I did not want to write a book about deadly statins. I do not like being a social pariah. I avoid controversy and debate. I have no desire to wade through tons of evidence to prove anything to anybody. I do not discuss politics or religion at social gatherings. I rarely extend a helping hand to anyone. It is too easy being rejected or have my intentions misunderstood.

We live in peace a long way from anywhere. We socialize a little but only with true and dear friends. Those are few.

I was completely satisfied that statins were deadly because when I quit them I felt better and with a few changes in diet, I healed nearly completely.

What on earth would provoke me to bring so much noise and disquiet to my and Hannah’s lives?

Hannah felt compelled and driven to write about it. I resisted either actively or passively. Gradually, I tried to encourage.

It was a deadly virus. It came in through my ears. It infected my mind. The first symptom was I started to question. Who developed them? Could it be that money was really that important to some? How did our trusted FDA approve them? It became an invasive detriment to my thinking about anything else.

Next, it infected my heart and the questions became both more personal and global. "Are there really people who would hurt me and millions of other human beings cavalierly?" I had long known about wars for territory, economics and ideology -- but mass destruction of a people for profit? Your own people? Did they know what they were doing?

Then my soul began to feel the effects. Did I have a responsibility to do anything? Where does responsibility leave off and ego begin? Could it be that I was wrong? Was there anything innocent that I was missing? What, just what, could I do? Would it make a difference?

The virus became systemic. I battled with it for 2 ½ years.

I had written for years for my own pleasure. A few short stories and recollections of the extraordinary people I had known. Sometimes I wrote observations of the world.

Once I had actually had something published -- a short piece of humor for a local newsletter that got picked up by a national magazine. There is nothing in me that imagines I can write. My love of great prose proves the contrary. 

I wrote. I wrote some more. Hannah’s compulsion to get the warning out had overcome me.

She wrote the science and I wrote the history. Together we assembled the pieces that became “How Statin Drugs REALLY Lower Cholesterol and Kill You One Cell At a Time".

It bears no resemblance to anything I ever thought I might write -- what I had thought would be a novel or some philosophical treatise, but never the truth.

“Truth never lost ground to enquiry.” (William Penn; Compliments of Marjorie)

 James B. Yoseph

 
Dear Doctor Y:

Early developmental statins were called "ML-236B" and "compactin". Here is a small sampling of the evidence for which you requested, demonstrating that the developers knew that statins killed cells (which physicians in the dark hail as a marvelous "pleiotropic effect").

For more information read:
How Statins Really Lower Cholesterol (And Kill You One Cell at a Time).
 
Today, actually just minutes ago, new drug company generated studies were released that promote the good of statin drugs. Tell any lie loud enough and long enough and sooner or later nearly everyone will believe it.

STATINS ARE POISON. Absolutely, unequivocally, scientifically proven fact.

If you have taken statins drugs then you have been poisoned. That is what they do. Statin drugs are extracted from or synthesized to replicate fungal toxins. Toxins are called that for a reason. They are toxic. 

 Statins do not reduce or block cholesterol. They cause the transfer of cholesterol from the blood stream into cells. The blood cholesterol lowers. Cells die and are blocked from replicating. Cell replication is vital to life. Slow death begins immediately. 

 There is no such thing as a statin side effect. Statin poisoning is a direct and predictable effect of statin use. 

 Evevry statin user is a victim of this process. Some people have almost immediate symptoms.

 The medical modality for statin-induced symptoms is to change statins rather than stop their use altogether. 

 Some people develop these effects slowly and are usually misdiagnosed as to the cause of their disease or discomfort. 

 The most common and immediate statin use effect is muscle soreness and pain.

 The other effects as symptoms of statin use are to many to list but here are a few:

 ·     Type 2 diabetes
·      Arthritis
·      CVD, heart attack and stroke
·      Renal failure
·      Cardiomyopathy causing low BP
·      Cancer (mainly breast and prostate)
·      MS
·      ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease)
·      GERD
·      Diverticulosis
·      Premature aging
·      Emotional/psychiatric disorders
·      Loss of memory
·      Cataracts
·      Hearing loss
·      Loss of balance
·      Loss of libido (men and women)
·      Erectile dysfunction
·      Chronic fatigue
·      ILD Interstitial lung disease

 Statins are genotoxic and cause cell mutations.

 Everyone taking statins long term will develop one or more of these direct effects of statin use. 

 There are two kinds of cell death. Necrosis is normal cell death. It is why cells replicate and replace themselves. Apoptosis is abnormal cell death caused by statins and other poisons. 

 Statins block cell replication and cause apoptosis. 

 Statins block the mevalonate pathway inside the cell. It is down that pathway that come all the ingredients(isoprenoids) essential to life, energy and health. 

 If you have permanent damage from statin use, buy “How Statin Drugs REALLY Lower Cholesterol” and take it to an attorney. It was written as a go by for civil litigation.

 Some statin injuries are slow to repair (brain and muscle) and may never fully heal.

You have a right to remedy.
 
We recently received an email from a disgruntled doctor in San Diego who complained we were encouraging malpractice suits. 

She said her insurance provider would financially penalize the people in her medical group if they did not keep cholesterol below certain levels -- and that we were coming against the best tool that could achieve those goals.

We sent a quick response and encouraged her to wrestle with the powers that be and help us take the practice of medicine back from the drug cartels and insurance providers.

In hindsight we might have written this:

Dear Doctor X,

Where is your outrage?

If what we have written is true, and it is, then an appropriate response would be, “I will not practice medicine again rather than prescribe another statin. I will help anyone suffering statin toxicity for free. I will help any patient sue these sonsabitches. I will testify for them.”

Either help us stop this madness or at the very least get out of the way with your selfish concerns about what is going to happen to you.

Drug company personnel are knowingly and deliberately ignoring science for profit. They are poisoning your family, friends, patients and now recommending these poisons for your children.

Where is your conscience? What could you be thinking?

Of course we wrote for the lawyers. Who else might have enough clout to bring an end to this insanity? What else might engender enough fear in the medical community to start at least a little resistance? What happened to the oath to "do no harm"?

If doctors do not have enough concern to help, then only the lawyers and patients can provide a remedy.

We have deliberately and knowingly lit a match to a box of tinder that sits on top a trainload of dynamite which is parked in the middle of medicine, as we now know it.

Big pharma, the FDA, the NIH, the AMA, the AHA or any other corrupt or corruptible companies or agencies must not control medicine.

Medicine must be returned to the doctors with enough courage to practice it in earnest. The doctors who sit on their dead asses, collect their big paychecks and prescribe these poisons need to be rooted out of medicine.

Stop, for God’s sake stop and think. Get informed. Ignorance is not an acceptable excuse.

In any case, the match is lit. On which wagon are you going to be: big pharma's or the victims'? 

Yours truly,

Hannah Yoseph, MD